 |
Uncensored Justice System Discussion
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JUSTICE1st
Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 715
Location: USA
|
 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 3:31 am Post subject: How's Cynthia Holding Up? |
 |
|
Does anyone know how Cynthia is doing? I'm just wondering how she is holding up through this latest outrage against her (failure of the SD DA's office to dismiss with prejudice), and hope she is doing okay.
This whole thing makes me so mad at the SD DA's office, for being so petty and small-minded they cannot admit to making a terrible mistake. I issued a "contempt citation," but I know that's small comfort to Cindy. I just hope they'll see reason soon. How they can keep this insanity going is beyond me. 
J 
_________________
"We must remember, always, that accusation is not proof, and conviction depends on evidence and due process of law."
EDWARD R. MURROW, 1954 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SaberGal
Joined: 12 Dec 2007
Posts: 349
Location: Oregon
|
| Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
You and me both. 
I do hope that she is doing well and has moved permanently as far away from CA as possible. The powers that be (no matter where they are) don't like losing and they will do everything possible to nail her with something else if possible...so the farther away she is, the better, IMO.
_________________
"Evil triumphs when good men do nothing."
- E. Burke
__________________________________________
That's OK. I wasn't using my civil liberties anyway. (Insert rolly eye emoticon here) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RayStar
Joined: 14 Dec 2007
Posts: 52
Location: Detroit, MI
|
| Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't understand why the DA will not let this woman go. The test results have proven there was no poison. Maybe Arnold S. will step in. LOL I know wishful thinking on my part. I just want for CS to be able to return to raising her children and enjoying life.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JUSTICE1st
Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 715
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SaberGal wrote: | You and me both.
I do hope that she is doing well and has moved permanently as far away from CA as possible. The powers that be (no matter where they are) don't like losing and they will do everything possible to nail her with something else if possible...so the farther away she is, the better, IMO. |
When attorney Clarence Darrow was tried twice in Los Angeles for Jury Bribery and the nightmare was finally over (acquittal in the first trial, a hung jury in the second, for which the state didn't retry), he never returned to Los Angeles again after that. Who could blame him! 
I'm glad that Cindy is away from CA too. As far as I'm concerned, the only thing she's "guilty" of is ticking off LG and BD, both of whom for some ridiculous reason can't let their personal disapproval of her go. Both of them really need to accept the fact that their personal disapproval is NOT a felony offense. And they're making the entire SD DA's office look like a bunch of jerks.
J
_________________
"We must remember, always, that accusation is not proof, and conviction depends on evidence and due process of law."
EDWARD R. MURROW, 1954 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JUSTICE1st
Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 715
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RayStar wrote: | | I don't understand why the DA will not let this woman go. The test results have proven there was no poison. Maybe Arnold S. will step in. LOL I know wishful thinking on my part. I just want for CS to be able to return to raising her children and enjoying life. |
Hi Ray! Only my opinion of course, but I think that both LG and BD have allowed their personal disapproval of Cindy to seriously cloud their prosecutorial judgment. I think they are making a huge error in not just dropping the whole matter and moving on. How many times do we have to remind them; NO poison, NO crime...therefore, NO case. 
J
_________________
"We must remember, always, that accusation is not proof, and conviction depends on evidence and due process of law."
EDWARD R. MURROW, 1954 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RayStar
Joined: 14 Dec 2007
Posts: 52
Location: Detroit, MI
|
| Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Justice1st! I know they must have something better to keep them busy. This is a dead horse. Also, I think I read somewhere probably over there that CS has to stay in CA for now because of the charges. I doubt she will stay there once the DA's stop and smell the coffee. The state should suffer somehow for allowing this case to continue and wasting taxpayers dollars!
 Hey Arnold send CS home to MI. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pia
Joined: 12 Dec 2007
Posts: 208
Location: www.freecynthia.com
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cindy is still staying in California (away from San Diego) for now. She has been traveling back and forth to see her children but returning to her cousin's. I am not sure how long she will stay there. She probably hasn't made that decision yet either. I am sure that she will stay throughout the legal proceedings though.
_________________
Justice is conscience, not a personal conscience but the conscience of the whole of humanity. Those who clearly recognize the voice of their own conscience usually recognize also the voice of justice.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pia
Joined: 12 Dec 2007
Posts: 208
Location: www.freecynthia.com
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh one other thing. Cindy is free to do whatever she pleases. There are no charges, nothing to keep her there legally. I don't even think the DA has or ever has had any intention on bringing the charges again. I think they are just doing this with the dismissal to cover their own behinds.
Could be vindictiveness but I honestly don't see how they could ever bring charges again. In my opinion I don't think that even if they somehow found arsenic again, with the way they these tests have been, how could that ever hold up? What jury in it’s right mind would trust that after everything we have seen so far?
_________________
Justice is conscience, not a personal conscience but the conscience of the whole of humanity. Those who clearly recognize the voice of their own conscience usually recognize also the voice of justice.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JUSTICE1st
Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 715
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Pia wrote: | Oh one other thing. Cindy is free to do whatever she pleases. There are no charges, nothing to keep her there legally. I don't even think the DA has or ever has had any intention on bringing the charges again. I think they are just doing this with the dismissal to cover their own behinds.
Could be vindictiveness but I honestly don't see how they could ever bring charges again. In my opinion I don't think that even if they somehow found arsenic again, with the way they these tests have been, how could that ever hold up? What jury in it’s right mind would trust that after everything we have seen so far? |
Hi Pia! I'm very glad to hear this, I just wish the SD DA's office would just dismiss with prejudice and move on already. Even if they don't admit anything publicly, which we know they won't by now. Of course it would have been nice if they'd done the honorable thing, admit they made a terrible mistake and apologized, but that isn't going to happen. At least they could just quietly dismiss with prejudice so they AND Cindy could move on. Why they can't even do that is beyond me.
J
_________________
"We must remember, always, that accusation is not proof, and conviction depends on evidence and due process of law."
EDWARD R. MURROW, 1954 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pia
Joined: 12 Dec 2007
Posts: 208
Location: www.freecynthia.com
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JUSTICE1st wrote: | | Pia wrote: | Oh one other thing. Cindy is free to do whatever she pleases. There are no charges, nothing to keep her there legally. I don't even think the DA has or ever has had any intention on bringing the charges again. I think they are just doing this with the dismissal to cover their own behinds.
Could be vindictiveness but I honestly don't see how they could ever bring charges again. In my opinion I don't think that even if they somehow found arsenic again, with the way they these tests have been, how could that ever hold up? What jury in it’s right mind would trust that after everything we have seen so far? |
Hi Pia! I'm very glad to hear this, I just wish the SD DA's office would just dismiss with prejudice and move on already. Even if they don't admit anything publicly, which we know they won't by now. Of course it would have been nice if they'd done the honorable thing, admit they made a terrible mistake and apologized, but that isn't going to happen. At least they could just quietly dismiss with prejudice so they AND Cindy could move on. Why they can't even do that is beyond me.
J |
It just makes me think that they are up to something. Although I don't have a clue as to what it could possibly be. It doesn't make sense that they wouldn't end this. Maybe they may be trying to manufacture a new cause of death...I can hardly wait to see if they do try that one. 
_________________
Justice is conscience, not a personal conscience but the conscience of the whole of humanity. Those who clearly recognize the voice of their own conscience usually recognize also the voice of justice.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JUSTICE1st
Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 715
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pia wrote: | | JUSTICE1st wrote: | | Pia wrote: | Oh one other thing. Cindy is free to do whatever she pleases. There are no charges, nothing to keep her there legally. I don't even think the DA has or ever has had any intention on bringing the charges again. I think they are just doing this with the dismissal to cover their own behinds.
Could be vindictiveness but I honestly don't see how they could ever bring charges again. In my opinion I don't think that even if they somehow found arsenic again, with the way they these tests have been, how could that ever hold up? What jury in it’s right mind would trust that after everything we have seen so far? |
Hi Pia! I'm very glad to hear this, I just wish the SD DA's office would just dismiss with prejudice and move on already. Even if they don't admit anything publicly, which we know they won't by now. Of course it would have been nice if they'd done the honorable thing, admit they made a terrible mistake and apologized, but that isn't going to happen. At least they could just quietly dismiss with prejudice so they AND Cindy could move on. Why they can't even do that is beyond me.
J |
It just makes me think that they are up to something. Although I don't have a clue as to what it could possibly be. It doesn't make sense that they wouldn't end this. Maybe they may be trying to manufacture a new cause of death...I can hardly wait to see if they do try that one. |
I can't believe I missed this one, but I've missed a lot since summer vacation began.
All we (and Cindy, of course) can do is hope the SD DA's office will admit they made a huge error and allow Cindy to go on with her life.
As to your suspicion, Pia, I certainly hope the DA's office won't try to do anything as stupid as try to manufacture a new cause of death. What part of NO ARSENIC, NO MURDER, NO CASE do these people just not get? ARRRRRRGH! It truly boggles the mind at times. 
J
_________________
"We must remember, always, that accusation is not proof, and conviction depends on evidence and due process of law."
EDWARD R. MURROW, 1954 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
