Uncensored Justice System Discussion

JUSTICE1st · Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 715 Location: USA

I have to wonder; WHERE was the so-called "evidence" that convicted the defendant, Noura Jackson, of second-degree murder in this case? Indeed, WHAT was it, because I really would like to know! Mad

There is no denying the fact that this was a horrific, heinous stabbing death, but I didn't see ANY proof offered by the state that put the actual murder weapon in Ms. Jackson's hand to convict her of this crime. Again, I wasn't watching every second of the trial coverage of the case, so I may have missed a crucial point where either of the prosecutors presented actual FORENSIC evidence that proved Noura Jackson killed her mother.

If anyone saw anything I didn't see, such as anything other than "behavior evidence," please let me know. Right now, I'm seeing what looks to be another replay, albeit an entirely different murder case, of the Cynthia Sommer trial, where there was also nothing other than so-called "behavior evidence" to convict the defendant. We all know how THAT case eventually turned out. Rolling Eyes

J

_________________
"We must remember, always, that accusation is not proof, and conviction depends on evidence and due process of law."
EDWARD R. MURROW, 1954

Pia · Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:18 am Post subject:

I missed this trial. Another circumstantial case huh? With a conviction? You know I hate circumstantial cases...
_________________
Justice is conscience, not a personal conscience but the conscience of the whole of humanity. Those who clearly recognize the voice of their own conscience usually recognize also the voice of justice.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn

JUSTICE1st · Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 715 Location: USA